In certain situations, self-paced instruction is a viable
and easily implemented alternative which can offer significant benefits
to your organization.
Even though the initial design and development costs of
SPI are higher than
those of instructor-led training, the savings on delivery are higher
still:
- Dedicated instructor costs are eliminated, as regular staff
can act as coaches and administrators.
- Training facility, travel, and accommodation costs are eliminated,
as employees need only a quiet study space and small segments of time
to dedicate to training.
- Employees experience minimal work disruption, as SPI
courses are modular. Lessons are deliberately kept short so learners
can study the material in small chunks at a convenient time during
the working day.
- Learners do not have to wait until a live class is scheduled.
They can start learning as soon as they begin work, thus becoming
productive more quickly.
Paper-based SPI
is relatively inexpensive to produce and update.
Organizations wishing to try SPI
might consider piloting the approach with a paper-based course. Then,
if the results are positive, further courses can be developed in CBT
or WBT format as required.
Paper-based SPI course
materials are easily migrated to a CD-ROM
or the Web.
Employees learn more effectively with SPI:
- The combination of modular design and diagnostic tests allows users
to study only what they need to know, eliminating time wasted learning
material that is irrelevant or already known.
- Delivery is on demand, enabling learners to study any time, anywhere,
and for however long they choose.
- Learning acquisition, transfer, and retention are enhanced with
opportunities for practice throughout.
- Performance errors are immediately corrected by means of feedback
throughout a learning activity.
- Competency is measured, as learners must successfully complete performance
tests before proceeding to the next segment.
- Learners can review a module or lesson as a refresher before performing
a specific task, thus increasing the chances of it being properly
completed.
SPI
is the ideal training solution when certain tasks must be performed
in a consistent fashion. SPI
can help standardize both the learning experience and learner performance
because every learner works through the same material and has to meet
the same standards of performance.
Note: While SPI
is highly effective, it must be adequately supported to maximize its
effectiveness. Individuals who learn on their own require some kind
of training associate—a buddy, a mentor, a coach—to provide
encouragement, support, and guidance.

If a significant percentage of an organization’s
resource materials are available in print or on the corporate intranet,
it is possible that much of the knowledge component of a course could
be delivered as self-paced instruction.
SPI is the solution of choice when:
- task performance must be consistent across the enterprise
- performance criteria are clear-cut and straightforward
- successful performance can be measured through standardized questions
(e.g., yes/no, multiple choice, task sequencing, etc.)
- the topic consists primarily of facts (e.g., product features and
benefits, regulations and policies, or procedures)
- course content is stable
- course material can be presented in small segments
- the number of employees requiring training varies significantly
across time
- learners have varying needs (e.g., current knowledge and skills,
learning rates and styles)
- learners are geographically distributed
- learners will take the training on an as-and-when-needed basis
- learners benefit from repeating training segments as refreshers
before performing unfamiliar or infrequent tasks
SPI should not be used as the sole means of training
when:
- there is physical risks involved in the training
- course content includes complex issues of interpretation that do
not have clear-cut answers
- skills are best learned in an interactive group setting in which
learners are able to perform and debrief comprehensive “live”
practices (e.g., communications skills, sales training)
- course content cannot be easily broken down into small independent
segments
- course content must be revised frequently
- unique instructor expertise cannot be accurately conveyed in a
self-paced course
- behaviours should be modeled/demonstrated in a live setting
- learners would benefit significantly from group discussions and
practices
In such cases, the better choice is to use instructor-led
training or a combination of self-paced and instructor-led training.

BrainWave Solutions Inc. members have over thirty years
of experience in creating powerful self-paced instruction solutions
for a variety of training needs, including:
- job planning, blueprint reading, layout, and fitting for journeymen
fabricators
- contract management skills for new and experienced public sector
employees
- network management concepts for telecommunications sales staff
- equipment checking and operating procedures for front-end loader,
moveable cranes, and trackmobile operators
- stepped pole climbing and ladder handling procedures for cable installers
- labour force survey principles and procedures for field interviewers
- basic first aid procedures for company safety personnel
- industrial hygiene for in-plant postal workers
Tell me more about the
uses and benefits of CBT
and WBT...
Tell me about your track record in designing
and developing SPI...
Back to the overview section on SPI...
Back to the section on types of SPI...
